Legal Opinion

Soly v. Aasen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Pembina County; Sauter, J. Action by Peder Soly against Gudbjorn Aasen and Knud G. Aasen. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

This is an equitable action, brought to set aside a certain deed given by the defendant Gudbjorn Aasen to his father, Knud G. Aasen, as without consideration, fraudulent, and void so far as the plaintiff’s judgment is concerned, and to subject the lands conveyed by such deed to the plaintiff’s judgment described in the complaint. The answer denies that such deed was fraudulent and alleges that such lands had been • actually owned by defendant Knud G. Aasen since 1890, and further alleges that the son had never had any interest in such lands. The case has been appealed to this court by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Day v. LownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  2. Pierstoff v. JorgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Schaible v. ArdnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Petree v. BrothertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bongard v. BlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGuigan v. HeuerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Murphy v. CaseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Ewaniuk v. RosenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API