Legal Opinion
State of Tennessee v. Paul H. Clever
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Decided September 14, 2001No. W2000-01810-CCA-R3-CDPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GLENN, Judge.
The defendant pled guilty to driving under the influence and was sentenced as a multiple offender. In this appeal as of right, the defendant alleges that (1) the trial court erred in finding that he was a third offender for purposes of sentencing, and (2) the DUI sentencing statute is unconstitutional because it is vague and has an ex post facto effect. After careful review, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence.
DISCUSSION
On August 8, 1999, the defendant was charged in a three-count indictment, the first two counts for DUI, Tenn.Code Ann. § 55-10-401, and the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blankenship v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PoseyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- State of Tennessee v. Larry Wade GibsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- State of Tennessee v. Pascasio MartinezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
- State of Tennessee v. Ricky Lynn Norwood, AliasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- State of Tennessee v. Sylvester Gailes, Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.