State v. Spaulding
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Concurrence
*394Tomasi, Supr. J.,
¶ 39. Specially Assigned, concurring. I agree with the majority that we should reject the totality-of-the-circumstances test set out in the plurality opinion in State v. Marcy, 165 Vt. 89, 680 A.2d 76 (1996). I do so, however, based on an alternate rationale and come to a different result concerning the admission of recorded recollections based on claims of “general honesty.” Because I conclude that the trial court’s use of the incorrect standard requires reversal, I concur in the Court’s judgment reversing and remanding for a new trial.6
I. Vermont Rule of Evidence 803(5)
¶…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- United States v. Jonathan PennyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- State v. OscarsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- United States v. Todd Michael PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.