Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Spaulding

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 8, 2014No. 2013-208Published

1Concurrence

*394Tomasi, Supr. J.,

¶ 39. Specially Assigned, concurring. I agree with the majority that we should reject the totality-of-the-circumstances test set out in the plurality opinion in State v. Marcy, 165 Vt. 89, 680 A.2d 76 (1996). I do so, however, based on an alternate rationale and come to a different result concerning the admission of recorded recollections based on claims of “general honesty.” Because I conclude that the trial court’s use of the incorrect standard requires reversal, I concur in the Court’s judgment reversing and remanding for a new trial.6

I. Vermont Rule of Evidence 803(5)

¶…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. United States v. Jonathan PennyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. State v. OscarsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. United States v. Todd Michael PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API