Legal Opinion
Mattingly v. Piccinini (In Re Piccinini)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 17, 2010No. 19-41922PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order Striking Jury Demand
STEVEN RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge.
Plaintiff Karen Mattingly and Debtor-Defendant Adorno Piccinini are former spouses and business partners. A Judgment of Divorce Decree was entered on November 2, 2006. Both prior and subsequent to the Divorce Decree the parties entered into several agreements to try to manage their joint business affairs. Eventually Mattingly initiated litigation in the Oakland County Circuit Court. (Case No. 06-077613-CZ)
Prior to the conclusion of the Oakland County litigation, Mattingly filed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Langenkamp v. CulpSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,430 in Re William J. McLaren Debtor. William Longo, Sr. v. William J. McLarenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Alexander v. HillmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- In the Matter of Alfred Lawrence Merrill, A/K/A Larry Merrill, Bankrupt. Larry Merrill v. Walter E. Heller & Company of Alabama, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bailey v. BaileyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022