Legal Opinion

Radmer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 2012No. WD 74014PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

The State appeals from the motion court’s grant of Skylor Radmer’s (“Rad-mer”) Rule 29.15 motion based on the ineffective assistance of counsel he received during the sentencing phase of his bifurcated trial. The State claims that defense counsel’s failure to call a psychologist to testify about Radmer’s mental disability in the sentencing phase did not rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural History 1

Radmer was first charged with statutory rape and statutory sodomy in 2003. Bert Godding (“Godding”) represented Radmer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. Hutchison v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  5. Vaca v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aundra Woods v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Anthony Wallace v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State of Missouri ex rel. Polaris Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James K. JourneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. James L. Brown v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API