Radmer v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
The State appeals from the motion court’s grant of Skylor Radmer’s (“Rad-mer”) Rule 29.15 motion based on the ineffective assistance of counsel he received during the sentencing phase of his bifurcated trial. The State claims that defense counsel’s failure to call a psychologist to testify about Radmer’s mental disability in the sentencing phase did not rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural History 1
Radmer was first charged with statutory rape and statutory sodomy in 2003. Bert Godding (“Godding”) represented Radmer…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Hutchison v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Vaca v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aundra Woods v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Anthony Wallace v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- State of Missouri ex rel. Polaris Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James K. JourneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- James L. Brown v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.