Legal Opinion

Mont v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 2019No. 17-8995PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

*1829 This case requires the Court to decide whether a convicted criminal's period of supervised release is tolled-in effect, paused-during his pretrial detention for a new criminal offense. Specifically, the question is whether that pretrial detention qualifies as "imprison[ment] in connection with a conviction for a Federal, State, or local crime." 18 U.S.C. § 3624 (e). Given the text and statutory context of § 3624(e), we conclude that if the court's later imposed sentence credits the period of pretrial detention as time served for the new offense, then the pretrial detention also tolls the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. United States v. HaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. United States v. Rosie DigglesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. The Ohio State Univ. v. Redbubble, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Lonnie LillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API