Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. United States

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided November 20, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 68-363PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge.

This action seeks recovery under Section 1346(a) (1), 28 U.S.C., for federal income taxes alleged to have been erroneously collected.

The tax involved was paid in connection with joint returns of the plaintiffs, who are husband and wife. The claim for relief applies, however, wholly to income derived from a retirement annuity paid the husband under the provisions of Section 6(c) of the Civil Service Retirement Act of 1930, 5 U.S.C. Section 8336(c).

It is the contention of the plaintiffs that the annuity payments received by the plaintiff John B. O’Neal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Oren E. CumminsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. Auerbach v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970
  2. Carlton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  3. Stewart v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Stout v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API