Legal Opinion

Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Bouterie

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1936No. 1634Published

1Per curiam

It is urged in the application for rehearing that there is no proof in the record that the plaintiff is the holder and owner of the note sued on. This is incorrect. Mr. Brock testified that the Continental Bank & Trust Company, in liquidation, is the holder and owner of this note. There was no denial of this testimony in any part of the evidence offered in the case, and we accepted this testimony as true.

It is contended that we in effect overruled the cases of Stevens v. Sonnier, 11 La.App. 398, 122 So. 894, and Collins v. Magee, 15 La.App. 66, 130 So. 267. These cases have no relevancy to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins v. MageeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. South Shreveport Finance & Loan Co. v. StephensonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. Stevens v. SonnierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Morris Plan Bank v. SchmidtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API