Legal Opinion

State v. Kalil

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 3, 2012No. AC 32804PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBINSON, J.

The defendant, Albert Kalil, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103 (a) and larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2009) § 53a-123 (a). On appeal, the defendant contends that (1) the court improperly admitted the testimony of a Rhode Island police officer because the prejudicial effect of his testimony far outweighed its probative value, (2) there was insufficient evidence to prove that the defendant was guilty of burglary in the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. State v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. CopasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FrankoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  3. State v. CoteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
  4. State v. KalilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
  5. State v. ScottConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API