Wileman v. Signal Finance Corp.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court denying an award of attorney’s fees sought pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 37.
I
The plaintiff, Signal Finance Corp., brought an action against the defendants, Donald and Jean Wileman, alleging breach of a promissory note. The defendants answered by alleging that plaintiff had ceased to do business in Delaware, thus preventing the defendants from making payments on the note, and initiated discovery by serving interrogatories upon the plaintiff.
After plaintiff failed to respond within 60 days, the defendants…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lapp v. TitusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Williams v. HallSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
- Warner v. WARNER COMPANYSuperior Court of Delaware · 1962
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cline v. Prowler Industries of MaryLand, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Hoag v. Amex Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Green v. BloodsworthSuperior Court of Delaware · 1985
- Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Cebenka v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.