Legal Opinion

Rudolf v. Shayne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*419In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (LaMarca, J.), entered November 18, 2005, as is in their favor and against the defendants in the principal sum of only $28,703.27, and the defendants cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same judgment as, upon an order of the same court dated October 28, 2005, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. McKenna v. Forsyth & ForsythAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Affiliated Credit Adjustors, Inc. v. Carlucci & LegumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. DePinto v. Rosenthal & CurryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martire v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ortega v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API