Legal Opinion

United States v. Barry Jay Feldman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 13, 1987No. 84-5142PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In his motion of May 11,1987, Barry Jay Feldman contends that he was deprived of his sixth amendment right to appointed counsel on direct appeal. He requests that we recall the mandate in this case and grant him a new appeal. In his motion of May 15, 1987, Feldman asks this court to appoint an attorney to represent him in any further proceedings before this court.

The right to counsel on direct appeal arises not from the sixth amendment, but from due process and equal protection considerations. See, e.g., Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963); Ross v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Barry Jay Feldman v. Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Joseph Kenneth Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Sharif Kader HamdanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API