Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Campbell
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 2010No. 2009-2358PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal arising from a declaratory-judgment action to determine whether insurance coverage exists in a lawsuit involving injuries stemming from a misguided teenage prank, we are asked to apply the doctrine of inferred intent with respect to intentional-act exclusions. Because we decline to allow the intent to harm to be inferred as a matter of law in cases in which the harm suffered cannot be deemed an inherent result of the intentional act, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals in part and remand to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. Case…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. MugaveroNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Preferred Risk Insurance v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Granger v. Auto-Owners Ins. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Chiquita Brands Int'l., Inc. v. Nat'l. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh PaOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Johnson v. U.S. Title Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Burlington Insurance v. Eden Cryogenics LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Granger v. Auto Owners Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.