Schwabacher Bros. v. Abrahams Grocery Co.

This appeal is from an order of the superior court of King county, refusing to dissolve an attachment.(1). Appellant’s first contention is that the attachment issued before the action was commenced by the service of summons. It was not issued, however, until after the filing of’ the complaint. The objection, therefore, is not well taken. Cosh-Murray Co. v. Tuttich, 10 Wash. 449 (38 Pac. 1134).(2). It is next urged that the allegations for the attachment were untrue. These allegations are, “ that said defendant has assigned secreted and disposed, and is about to assign, secrete and dispose of…