Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 22, 1978No. C 77-06-07820, CA 9533PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*811BUTTLER, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction and sentence for rape and sodomy, the principal assignment of error being the failure of the trial court to suppress statements made by defendant dining his initial encounter with the police before any Miranda warnings were given. He also assigns error to the recommendation of the trial court that defendant not be paroled, and the imposition of consecutive 20-year sentences for the two crimes. We affirm.

I

At 3 a.m. on the morning of June 4, 1977, two Multnomah County Sheriffs deputies received a call reporting a rape having occurred in Southwest…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. PazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MedenbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API