Legal Opinion

People v. Shelton

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2004PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the trial court misapplied the “prompt outcry” exception to the hearsay rule when it permitted the complainant’s daughter to testify lacks merit. An outcry of rape is prompt if made “at the first suitable opportunity” (People v O’Sullivan, 104 NY 481, 486 [1887]) and “is a relative concept dependent on the facts” (People v McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10, 17 [1993]). In determining that the complaint here was prompt, the trial court properly considered that the rape occurred late at night, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. McDanielNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. . O'SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. StearnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. FilerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. MendozaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API