Legal Opinion

Hobart v. Vanden Bosch

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1932No. Docket No. 122, Calendar No. 35,801PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This is a suit for damages which plaintiff alleges he sustained by reason of defendants’ unlawful conversion of 30 bank stock trust shares C-D3. On trial by the court without a jury, plaintiff had judgment. Defendants have appealed.

Pursuant to plaintiff’s order, A. Gr. Ghysels & Co., acting as broker, on or about May 18, 1929, purchased for plaintiff 30 bank stock trust shares C-D3 at a total cost of $1,065. By exchange of other securities delivered by plaintiff to his broker $938.30 was paid on plaintiff’s purchase. The balance of $126.70 remained unpaid. The stock purchased by plaintiff was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. O'Toole & Nedeau Co. v. BoelkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Murphy v. Frank P. Miller CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Keller v. Paulos Land CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Weinburgh v. SaierMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Murphy v. SincereAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  4. United States v. Haddix & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965
  5. In Re Virgil F Hoppert EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API