Hobart v. Vanden Bosch
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
This is a suit for damages which plaintiff alleges he sustained by reason of defendants’ unlawful conversion of 30 bank stock trust shares C-D3. On trial by the court without a jury, plaintiff had judgment. Defendants have appealed.
Pursuant to plaintiff’s order, A. Gr. Ghysels & Co., acting as broker, on or about May 18, 1929, purchased for plaintiff 30 bank stock trust shares C-D3 at a total cost of $1,065. By exchange of other securities delivered by plaintiff to his broker $938.30 was paid on plaintiff’s purchase. The balance of $126.70 remained unpaid. The stock purchased by plaintiff was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- O'Toole & Nedeau Co. v. BoelkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Murphy v. Frank P. Miller CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keller v. Paulos Land CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Weinburgh v. SaierMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Murphy v. SincereAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- United States v. Haddix & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965
- In Re Virgil F Hoppert EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.