Legal Opinion

Williams v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2015No. S-14-796PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

- 403 - Nebraska A dvance Sheets 291 Nebraska R eports WILLIAMS v. CITY OF OMAHA Cite as

291 Neb. 403

M arcus M. Williams, appellee, v. City of Omaha, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed July 17, 2015. No. S-14-796. 1. Statutes: Appeal and Error. Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which an appellate court must resolve independently of the trial court. 2. Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act: Appeal and Error. In actions brought under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, an appellate court will not disturb the factual findings of the trial court unless they are clearly wrong. 3.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Staley v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lalley v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jura v. City of OmahaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Maclovi-Sierra v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Perez v. City of OmahaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reiber v. County of GageNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Fales v. County of StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Moreno v. City of GeringNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Reiber v. County of GageNebraska Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API