Legal Opinion

Tayiah v. Bunnell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 23, 1919No. 9478PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Osage County; R. B. Boone, Judge. Action by Emmett Tayiah against Maude A. Bunnell. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Osage county, by Emmett Tayiah, plaintiff below, to recover from Maude A. Bunnell, defendant below, the sum of $5,000, together with Interest thereon at the rate of six per cent, per annum from the----day of May, 1914; plaintiff alleging that the said sum was due him as the purchase price of certain lands located in Kay county, Oklahoma, and further alleging that plaintiff in error had executed and delivered to defendant in error his deed on the --------day of May, 1914, with the agreement and understanding that said defendant in error should…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chambers v. ChambersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Jost v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Morton v. MortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Perry v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Webb v. BurnamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. General Explosives Co. v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Kirkpatrick v. Jacobson's Lifetime Buildings, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. HEIRS, ETC., OF PAYNE v. SeaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API