Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Floesch

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 23, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Witmer, S.

Petitioner, as remainderman under the will of Jacob M. Floesch, deceased, asks this court to require the legal representatives of the executors of the will of said testator to account for the property which they turned over to the life tenant pursuant to the decree of this court, dated June 4, 1928.

It appears that testator’s will was admitted to probate in this court on July 6,* 1926, and three executors thereof were appointed, namely, Eugene J. Dwyer, Emma G. Floesch and James B. Graham. Emma G. Floesch was also the life tenant named in testator’s will with power to use and consume…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Hulburd v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
Mahoney v. BernhardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
Post v. IngrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
Mahoney v. . BernhardNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
In re the Estate of O'DowdNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

In re the Estate of HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004