Legal Opinion

In Re: County of Orange, Debtor. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. County of Orange, Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 28, 2001No. 99-55853, 99-55967Published

1Opinion of the Court

262 F.3d 1014 (9th Cir. 2001)

In re: COUNTY OF ORANGE, Debtor.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant-Cross-Appellee,

v.

COUNTY OF ORANGE, Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 99-55853, 99-55967

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted October 10, 2000

Filed August 28, 2001

[Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Lawrence H. Richmond, Counsel, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington, D.C., for the appellant-cross-appellee.

Jim Persinger, Deputy County Counsel, Santa Ana, California, for the appellee-cross-appellant.

Appeal from the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Simonson v. GranquistSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Matagorda County v. Russell LawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API