Lauren M. Pavlovich v. National City Bank
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
The sole issue before us is whether the District Court abused its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Ohio’s applicable civil RICO statute, Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2923.34(H). We hold that the District Court did not abuse its discretion and affirm the award.
I. Background
The underlying facts of this case are recounted in our previous opinion, Pavlovich v. Nat’l City Bank, 435 F.3d 560 (6th Cir.2006). In short, Ms. Pavlovich sued National City Bank (“the Bank”) to recover funds lost through failed investments that the Bank administered but did…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Concha v. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Browning v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Lauren M. Pavlovich v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Sturm v. SturmOhio Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Winona Holdings, Inc. v. DuffeyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State ex rel. Squire v. PhippsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Ottawa Tribe of Okla. v. SpeckDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006