Legal Opinion

Gil v. Williams

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1857PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of East Baton Rouge, Bobertson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSpokford, J.

One Wm. B. Williamis having been convicted of importing slaves into the State in violation of the first section of the statute of the 29th January, 1817, the slaves were judicially declared forfeited to the State by virtue of the statute. See the State v. Williams, 7 Rob. 252, where a report of the facts may be found.

*220Subsequently one Thomas N. Brnis executed the following obligation, which is the basis of the present suit:

“$1500. Baton Bouse, March 13th, 1850.
“For value received, I promise to pay to A. M. Bunn, Wm. Gil and J. G. Patterson the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, on condition that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hatzfield v. GuldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  2. Wood v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crichfield v. Bermudez Asphalt Paving Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Chippewa Valley & Superior Railway Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Easton Tractor & Equipment Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936
  4. Hyland v. Oregon Hassam Paving Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. John T. Hardie's Sons & Co. v. ScheenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API