Legal Opinion
Rucker v. Garlock, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 24, 1996No. 95-190PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
672 So.2d 100 (1996)
Bill RUCKER, et al., Appellants,
v.
GARLOCK, INC., Appellee.
No. 95-190.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 24, 1996.
Arnold R. Ginsberg and Todd R. Schwartz; Ratiner, Reyes & O'Shea, Miami, for appellants.
Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell and George N. Meros, Jr. and Mary W. Chaisson, Tallahassee, and M. Stephen Smith and Stuart L. Cohen, Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
NESBITT, Judge.
Bill and Roberta Rucker sued Garlock, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of asbestos products, claiming Bill Rucker had incurred damages as a result of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goldschmidt v. HolmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Reyka v. Halifax Hosp. Dist.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Broward v. Russell, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Minks v. Polaris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. CicconeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Hernandez v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Sparks-Book v. Sports Authority, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.