Legal Opinion

Melchionne v. City of Newark

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 29, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

60 N.J. Super. 104 (1960)

158 A.2d 411

LUKE MELCHIONNE, ET ALS., APPELLANTS,

v.

CITY OF NEWARK, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 23, 1959.

Decided February 29, 1960.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.

Mr. Benjamin H. Chodash argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Krieger and Chodash and Mr. Leon S. Wolk, attorneys).

Mr. William L. Boyan, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Department of Civil Service (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General, attorney).

Mr. Thomas M. Kane argued the cause for respondent City of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barringer v. MieleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Flanagan v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Carls v. Civil Service Commission of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  4. Greco v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Adams v. City of AtlanticSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Demoura v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Loboda v. Clark Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Omrod v. NJ Department of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. In re Code Enforcement OfficerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  5. Marshall v. Hudson Co. Bd. of Chosen FreeholdersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API