McCoy v. Grant
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to' recover $320. In his separate answer Malcolm E. Grant set up as a defense the facts stated in the third paragraph of the opinion. The case was tried before Steele, J., who made findings and ordered judgment for $350. From an order denying his alternative motion for amended findings or for a new trial, defendant Malcolm E. Grant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiff, an-architect of the city of Minneapolis, set forth two canses of action in his complaint: The first for services in preparing preliminary sketches or plans for a dwelling house for defendants which were not accepted or used; the second for the value of the use of the plans and specifications under which the building was constructed. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law to the effect that plaintiff was not entitled to recover upon either cause of action against defendant Helen J. Grant, but was entitled to recover the sum of $50 upon the first cause of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Riebel v. MuellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Tumey v. LittleNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Ashworth v. GloverUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Ashworth v. GloverUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Weimer v. LambertRichmond City Circuit Court · 1973