Legal Opinion

National Shoe & Leather Bank v. Herz

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1881Published

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, P. J.:

This action was brought upon four promissory notes indorsed by the firm of Martin Herz & Company, and discounted by the plaintiff in the months of February and March, 1876. Prior to the 15th day of September, 1875, Martin Herz & Company were a firm doing business in the city of New York as dealers in kid gloves. The firm was composed of Martin Herz and one Ignatz Rosenberg. For several years prior to September 15, 1875, the firm, under its name of Martin Herz & Company, kept a continuous account in the plaintiff’s bank in which their deposits were credited and their checks…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ketcham v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  2. Vernon v. Manhattan Co.New York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Mechanics' Bank v. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  4. People v. VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API