Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Berman v. Berman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 1981No. 1976PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is a child custody case. We are all in agreement that the order of the lower court should be affirmed. Our only point of difference is regarding the standard of review that we should apply.

*93Judge HESTER says in his opinion that when the lower court has made a “penetrating and comprehensive inquiry into the facts,” and has filed “a comprehensive opinion containing its findings and conclusions,” its “decision will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.” At 1068. Judge CAVANAUGH and I believe that statement to be too broad.1

If the issue is whether we should reverse the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spriggs v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. In Re Custody of HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Scarlett v. ScarlettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. In Re Donna W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Newcomer v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Murphey v. HatalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. In Re Custody of TemosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API