United States v. Taylor
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 13-67 (BAH) GARFIELD M. TAYLOR, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Upon consideration of defendant Garfield M. Taylor’s pro se Motion for Reconsideration (“Def.’s Mot. Recons.”), ECF No. 116, the memorandum submitted by the government in opposition (“Gov’t’s Opp’n”), ECF No. 122, and the entirety of the underlying record, for the reasons set out below, defendant’s motion is GRANTED and his Motion Under Rule 60(b) to Re-Open Habeas Corpus Proceedings Pursuant to §…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.