Legal Opinion

State v. Zola

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 7, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

112 N.J. 384 (1988)

548 A.2d 1022

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JAMES E. ZOLA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 16, 1988.

Decided August 16, 1988.

As Amended October 7, 1988.

Claudia Van Wyk and Paul M. Klein, Assistant Deputy Public Defenders, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Defender, attorney).

Mildred Vallerini Spiller, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by O'HERN, J.

This is a pre-Ramseur/Biegenwald…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API