State v. Gonzalez
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEAR, J.
The defendant, Miguel Gonzalez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of interference with a search in violation of General Statutes § 54-33d. On appeal, the defendant claims (1) that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of the crime of interference with a search, and (2) that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to sever his trial on that charge from his trial on the charge of murder in connection with which the search at issue was conducted. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts, which the jury…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. CoccomoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. LeggettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. ReidConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015