Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Matson Navigation Co. Currie v. Matson Navigation Co. Stewart v. Matson Navigation Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1950No. 12349, 12352, 12350Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

These cases, consolidated on appeal, involve claims for war risk bonuses and maintenance for the periods in which appellants were interned on land by the Japanese Government during the recent war. Appellants were licensed and unlicensed crew members of the S. S. Malama. They sailed aboard that vessel on November 29, 1941, from San Francisco on a voyage described in the shipping articles as follows: “* * * from the port of San Francisco, California, to ports in the Philippine Islands by a route, including stops, as ordered by an agency or department of the United States…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Agnew v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. Federer v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API