Legal Opinion
United States v. Diallo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 31, 2009No. 07-3641PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
A petit jury convicted Mamadou Diallo of intentionally trafficking in goods and knowingly using a counterfeit mark on or in connection with those goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320(a). The goods were handbags bearing a counterfeit “LV” logo. The counterfeit “LV” logo was substantially indistinguishable from the genuine “LV” logo owned by the Louis Vuitton Malletier Corporation, a designer of luxury handbags. Diallo contends that his conviction should be set aside because the evidence was insufficient in that it failed to establish his “use” of the counterfeit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Alston v. Countrywide Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Abraham v. St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- In Re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Elizabeth Panzarella v. Navient Solutions IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.