Legal Opinion
Ruby v. Department of Transportation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 1, 1993No. 231 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGINLEY, Judge.
Presently before this Court are the preliminary objections of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT) to the petition for review of Carl W. Ruby (Ruby) filed in our original jurisdiction. 1
On July 15, 1990, Ruby was convicted of violating Section 3731 (driving under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pá.C.S. § 3731. Ruby’s operating privileges were suspended for a one-year period. On March 2, 1991, Ruby was convicted of driving while intoxicated in Maryland and Ruby received a six-month suspension from DOT. On April 11,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. ValentineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Curtis v. ClelandCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- COM., DOT, BUR. OF DR. LIC. v. CardellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. GreeneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Singleton v. LavanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- City of Philadelphia v. SchweikerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Success Against All Odds ex rel. St. Amand v. Department of Public Welfare of the CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Ladd v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Meade v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.