Legal Opinion

City of Norfolk v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 22, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

In 1930 there was a general reassesment of real estate in the city of Norfolk. The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company is, and was, the owner of certain property on Granby street which it claims Was then over-valued. It sought and obtained a measure of relief in the trial court. From the judgment of that tribunal the city has appealed.

Granby and Main are the two principal streets of Norfolk. Generally speaking, Main street runs east and west, and Granby, north and south. On the northwest comer of Main and Granby streets is the Atlantic Hotel which was for many years one of the leading hotels…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Norfolk v. SnyderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  2. City of Roanoke v. GibsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. City of Roanoke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Norfolk v. HollandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. In Re Pennsylvania R. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. In re Appeal of Pennsylvania RailroadNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API