Legal Opinion

Ellard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 3, 1933No. 22854PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

1. That a verdict rendered on a former trial was attached to the indictment and taken to the jury-room is not cause for a new trial, especially when there was no request to detach, erase, or in some way conceal the former verdict; and in this case the trial judge, in his order allowing the amendment to the motion .for a new trial complaining of such action, states that “the court can not say that counsel for movant did not know of the first verdict.” Allen v. State, 155 Ga. 332 (116 S. E. 534), and cit.; Smalls v. State, 105 Ga. 669 (6) (31 S. E. 571); Jordan v. State, 153 Ga. 167 (111 S. E.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Faust v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Liggett v. LiggettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Brooks v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Brooks v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Ivey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API