Legal Opinion

Gsell to Use v. Helman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1932No. Appeal 168PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This js an appeal by defendants, Florence Elizabeth Helman and Glen T. Helman, from the decree of the lower court dismissing a rule to open a judgment entered against defendants on a promissory note under seal, containing warrant of attorney for confession of judgment, executed by defendants, bearing date September 21, 1929, and calling for the payment of $1,-935 to the order of J. A. Gsell, plaintiff, one year after date. Judgment was entered thereon on September 23, 1929, for the face ,amount of the note with interest from its' date and a collection fee of 5%. On…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Hill v. EpleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  3. Tustin v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Ziegler v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Woods v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conrad's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. First National Bank v. MetherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Roper v. ScevcnikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Cardillo v. Torquato Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API