Legal Opinion

Olm v. Cather

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 7, 1927No. 1908Published

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding, in which priority was awarded Cather, the senior party. The issue is expressed in a single count as follows:

“An envelope made from a single blank and having two opposite walls of substantially uniform size, said blank having two openings, one providing a slit and the other providing a window in one wall of the envelope, and a flap extending from the outside of said wall adjacent the slit and adapted to be secured to said wall on the opposite side of the slit.”

As will be observed from a reading…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bungay v. GreyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API