Howland's Admr. v. Harr
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 99. — ACTION BY R. C. HARR & OTHERS AGAINST JAMES HOWLAND’S ADMINISTRATOR FOR ARTICLES SET APART TO HER AND HER INFANT CHILDREN, Appeal from Greenup Circuit Court. James P Harbeson, Circuit Judge. Judgment for Plaintiff. Defendant appeals. AUTHORITIES CITED. / Ky. Statutes, Section 1403; Ky. Statutes, Sections 3861 to 3865; South Western Reporter No. 76, page 354; Ky. Statutes, Section 1403, sub.
Read the full summary
Case 99. — ACTION BY R. C. HARR & OTHERS AGAINST JAMES HOWLAND’S ADMINISTRATOR FOR ARTICLES SET APART TO HER AND HER INFANT CHILDREN, Appeal from Greenup Circuit Court. James P Harbeson, Circuit Judge. Judgment for Plaintiff. Defendant appeals. AUTHORITIES CITED. / Ky. Statutes, Section 1403; Ky. Statutes, Sections 3861 to 3865; South Western Reporter No. 76, page 354; Ky. Statutes, Section 1403, sub. Section 4; Civil Code of Pratiue, Section 96; Civil Code of Practice, Section 606, sub Sections 1, 2 and 7; Hardin v. Taylor, 78 Ky. R. page 593; Forbes Bros. v. Cooper & Co., 88 Ky. R. page…
1Opinion of the Court
*733Opinion by
Chief Justice Hobson
Reversing.
James Howland and Rachel C. Pancake were married in December, 1899. Mrs. Pancake, ait the time they were married, was a widow with five children. Four of them were infants who went with her to How-land’s home, and lived there with him until he died on May 11, 1902. After Howland’s death John W. Collins qualified as> the administrator of his estate and subsequently the widow, who had intermarried with Jonas Harr, brought this -suit against the administrator charging- that there had been set apart to her various articles of personal property as the widow…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Crain v. WestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- White's Admx. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Strother v. McClaveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Thaxton's Guardian v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908