Ingram v. WAAY TELEVISION
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Ingram, the defendant, appeals from the denial of his Rule 60 (b)(1), ARCP, motion.
The trial court had previously entered a summary judgment in favor of WAAY, the plaintiff, upon an account. Prior to the summary judgment, no affidavit or other evidence was offered by defendant which countered the affidavit on behalf of the plaintiff. After the rendition of the summary judgment, Mr. Ingram promptly filed, and later amended, the subject motion alleging in substance that he did not file a counter-affidavit because of a mistake in docketing the date of the hearing upon the plaintiff's motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cockrell v. World's Finest Chocolate Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Gallups v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Coosa Marble Co., Inc. v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Marsh v. MarshCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Modernage Homes v. WooldridgeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hayden v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Tucker v. TuckerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- NORTH MONTGOMERY MATERIALS v. Federal Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Crenshaw v. CrenshawCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Henson v. HensonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.