In re Adoption of Sunderhaus
Ohio Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceHolmes, J.
My initial preference was to join the position of Justice Resnick in dissent; however, in review of the case law in this state, I have concluded that the common law did not afford a remedy to compel a putative father to contribute to the support of his illegitimate offspring.5 Furthermore, the law as announced by this state’s intermediate appellate courts has been to the effect that a reputed father of an illegitimate child is not legally and/or financially responsible for the maintenance of the child, unless there is a statute which imposes such a duty.6
Historically, it has been recognized…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Beebe v. CowleyOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Baugh v. CarverOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- STATE Ex GRIFFIN v. ZIMMERMANOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
- State ex rel. Davis v. Brown, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1951
- In Re Adoption of TothOhio Court of Appeals · 1986