Legal Opinion
Ung v. Universal Acceptance Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 3, 2016No. Civ. No. 15-127 (RHK/FLN)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge
In this putative class-action, Plaintiff Spencer Ung alleges that Defendant Universal Acceptance Corporation (“Universal”) made unauthorized calls to his cell phone, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq, Based on a settlement offer made in March 2016, Universal now argues Ung’s claims are moot, and it moves for the entry of judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny the Motion.
BACKGROUND
The Complaint alleges that beginning in June 2014, Universal repeatedly…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kuntze v. Josh Enters., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
- Gammella v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Yaakov v. Varitronics, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Lepkowski v. CamelBak Products, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019