Long v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of burglary and assessed the lowest punishment.
The undisputed testimony undoubtedly showed that he burglarized a drug store at the time and place alleged in the indictment. It is unnecessary to state the testimony on this point.
His defense was that he was insane at the time he committed the burglary, or, as otherwise stated, that at thé time he was laboring under such defects of reason from disease of the mind produced by the recent use of morphine, cocaine, bromidia, or some other drug or narcotic, that he did not know the nature and quality of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Dane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Bratt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Kirby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Brice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Upton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Shields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Brady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936