In Re Issac Washington and Peter Rinaldi
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Dissent
■TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge
(dissenting):
I respectfully dissent.
I agree that the government’s power to dismiss an indictment under Rule 48(a) is not absolute. I also agree that a Petite motion may be denied if granting the motion would be “clearly contrary to manifest public interest,” United States v. Cowan, supra, 524 F.2d at 513. With some hesitation, I agree that, although the primary purpose of the “by leave of court” requirement in Rule 48(a) is to protect the defendant from the government’s bad faith1, a trial judge may use his Rule 48(a) power to prevent other types of manipulation of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hayles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ackerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.