Legal Opinion

VARGAS v. SCHEIDT

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 2025No. 5:25-cv-01748Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GERARDO ROSENDO VARGAS, JR., : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-CV-1748 : JUDGE JILL M. SCHEIDT, et al., : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM GALLAGHER, J. MAY 7, 2025 Plaintiff Gerardo Rosendo Vargas, Jr., initiated this pro se civil action alleging his rights were violated in a state child dependency matter in the Berks County Court of Common Pleas. Named as Defendants are Judge Jill M. Scheidt and Berks County. Vargas seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. For the following reasons, the Court will grant Vargas leave to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API