Legal Opinion

United States v. Ben Tan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 1, 2021No. 20-56399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF No. 20-56399 AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-02165-JVS-ADS v. BEN GHEE TAN, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted October 6, 2021 Pasadena, California Filed November 1, 2021 Before: Susan P. Graber, Morgan Christen, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Graber 2 UNITED STATES V. TAN SUMMARY* Administrative Subpoena The panel affirmed the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Chamber of Commerce of United States of America v. WhitingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aleksei Sergeyevich Voronin v. William P. BarrDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
  2. Queerdoc, Pllc v. DOJ - United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
  3. Verthelyi v. Pennymac Mortgage Investment TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API