Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Ratsamy
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 20, 2007No. 50 EAP 2006Published
1Opinion of the Court
934 A.2d 1233 (2007)
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant
v.
Robert RATSAMY, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted June 25, 2007.
Decided November 20, 2007.
Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Philadelphia, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Robert Ratsamy, for Robert Ratsamy.
CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, BALDWIN, FITZGERALD, JJ.
OPINION
Justice FITZGERALD.
We granted allowance of appeal to determine whether the Superior Court failed to apply the proper substantive standard of review for a sufficiency of the evidence claim in a criminal matter. We…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.