Legal Opinion

Thurman v. Anderson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 23, 1972No. A-17596PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRETT, Judge.

This is an original proceeding for habeas corpus in which unlawful confinement is alleged.

Petitioner was convicted in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CRF 69-884, of automobile larceny and sentenced to three (3) years imprisonment. Petitioner was received at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary under this judgment and sentence on January 23, 1970. Petitioner was paroled from said sentence on December 21, 1970. While on parole, Petitioner was convicted in the District Court of Okmul-gee County, Case No. CRF 71-60, of sec*1075ond degree burglary and sentenced to four and one-half…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCollumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Ex Parte AdamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. In Re the Habeas Corpus of SalisburyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Dodd v. PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Marsh v. PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moss v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Boggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Higgins v. BranamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. MOSS v. OKLAHOMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API