Legal Opinion

State v. Droulia

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1997No. 96-KA-1428PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

hMURRAY, Judge.

William A. Droulia was convicted, subject to a Crosby plea, of possession of cocaine. He now appeals the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

On December 5, 1995 Mr. Droulia was charged by bill of information with possession of cocaine. He was arraigned, and entered a plea of not guilty. On March 8,1996 the parties appeared before the trial court for hearings on pretrial motions. The State and the defense entered a stipulation that if the police officers were called to testify, they would do so in accordance with the affidavit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. State v. ToneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. State v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API