Legal Opinion

Bogart v. Castor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 10,171PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee’s complaint seeks a recovery upon an assessment made for the construction of a ditch.

The first paragraph of the complaint is bad, for the reason that it does not appear that the appraisers of benefits and damages made a division of the cost of the construction of the ditch among the owners of the land affected. The statute requires that this shall be done. Acts 1877, p. 156.

Counsel for appellant contends that the appraisers need not embody a statement of the division of the cost of the ditch in the sworn report which the law requires them to make. We think otherwise. The letter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boatman v. MacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wysong v. Automobile Underwriters, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Shaw v. State ex rel. WhitmoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Lee v. BurnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API